![real mac geekbench scores real mac geekbench scores](http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2012/06/benchmarks.png)
Its SSD had read speeds up to nearly 5000 MB/s while the Mac only hit around 3000 MB/s.
#REAL MAC GEEKBENCH SCORES PC#
Storage speeds are important with massive video files, and this is, again, where the custom PC wins. The Mac’s card also ran hotter, though it was still nearly silent. It also almost doubled the frame rate performance for the gaming test in the Unigine Heaven benchmark. With optimum settings, the Threadripper beat the Mac by about 50%. Graphics are where the story changes back to the PC’s advantages. Apple also ran cooler by about 10 degrees, which can make an impact during longer sessions.
![real mac geekbench scores real mac geekbench scores](https://forums.macrumors.com/data/attachments/917/917210-b5f04e66420ffc3eb5aedb317255da14.jpg)
There were also some app crashes on Windows. Also, macOS seems to be faster and more responsive than Windows. The Mac barely even made noise, making it an area where Apple far exceeds any custom computer. Yuryev does point out that it did make the PC run extremely loud since all the fans needed to kick into gear. Again, the Threadripper and all its extra cores powered through with a score over three times better than the Mac Pro.
#REAL MAC GEEKBENCH SCORES PRO#
Things even up with the single-core score, but it still manages to beat the Mac Pro by about 10%.Ĭinebench is the real test for video editing and graphics. It is a more expensive CPU than the one in the Mac, but still, double the performance is totally worth it. The multi-core scores put the AMD 3970X Threadripper CPU in the PC at 26,037 compared to the 12,518 of the Mac Pro. Geekbench scores are the standard for computer comparisons and it is a good place to start. Also, just a reminder that the Mac Pro costs three times as much as the PC. The Mac Pro was configured with a 3.3GHz 12-core Xeon processor, 192GB DDR4 RAM, an AMD Radeon Pro Vega II graphics card with 32GB memory, a 1TB SSD, and the Afterburner card. Also, since it is a standard PC you can more easily add in extra hard drives and storage when you need them.Īs for a part by part comparison, the Threadripper PC has a 3.7 GHz 32-core AMD processor, 64GB DDR4 RAM, an NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti graphics card with 11GB memory, a 1TB SSD, Thunderbolt 3 card, and a watercooler. Other benefits of the PC are an expansion card that allows for creating a RAID with M.2 SSDs that can max out at 15,000 MB/s transfer speeds. It does win with Thunderbolt, as there are eight Thunderbolt 3 ports on the Mac Pro. How does this compare? The Mac Pro only has Wi-Fi 5, PCIe 3.0, two USB-A ports with USB 3.2 Gen 1 speeds. The Threadripper has Wi-Fi 6, PCIe 4.0, 10 USB-A ports with 7 supporting USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds, and two USB-C ports and two Thunderbolt 3 ports. Right off the bat, Yuryev points out how the motherboard he needed brings tons of features and I/O that beat that Mac Pro before the other components are even added. For one, the Mac Pro runs macOS while the Threadripper can’t even be set up as a Hackintosh and must run Windows. Yuryev attempted to make the comparison as even as possible when it comes to components, but he does point out that it is nearly impossible to match them up. Max Yuryev on the Max Tech YouTube channel put together one of those Threadripper PCs for $5,000 and compared it directly to a Mac Pro that costs $15,000.
![real mac geekbench scores real mac geekbench scores](https://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2019/07/geekbench-results-2019-base-13-inch-macbook-pro.jpg)
How exactly would a current Mac Pro hold up against a custom-built PC running some of the latest components? Any time a new Mac is released there is a wave of people saying “You can build a better PC for less!” The latest Mac Pro is one of the most criticized, especially with its eye-watering pricing scheme.